Witness showcase suffers slow start but ends strong
When Rancher decides to fire Lachewitz for not doing enough to spin a certain scandal, the latter tries to double cross the politician by recording Rancher's insult against retarded people like Arnie. As Lachewitz persists with his irritating rambling, Rancher briskly walks to the tape recorder and destroys the cassette with a loud cowboy stomp. It was at this point that the show became somewhat enjoyable.
The final play of the evening, On the Fall of the Sandwich Board and the Rise of Intangible Cities, has a title that might suggest that, like most of the other plays of the showcase, it was a lost cause. Indeed, as an allegory, it almost became lost in its attempt at becoming high art.
Surprisingly, however, the final play was the best of all four. Written and directed by Levitz and starring Bob (senior Mike Wills), Harriet (junior Emily Daly), Son (junior David Santare), and Girlfriend (freshman Emily Sucher), it carried on crisply with a clear point in mind and excellent execution that evoked a fulfilling emotional response without being too artsy or obscure.
The well-portrayed Bob and Harriet enter as a confused couple on a blind date in a restaurant. After a few minutes, they decide to get married and order a marriage from the waitress as if it were just a bottle of wine or basket of bread.
She soon returns with rope to tie the flabbergasted couple to their table. They later order a baby from the waitress, and, after she provides them with the bundled package, they return it to give it some years to grow up, as if it were just a piece of chicken that needed to be cooked a few more minutes.
Bob and Harriet fail to remember the name of their offspring, however, and he is simply called Son. In Santare's convincing performance as an emo teen, Son reflects on his somewhat meaningless entry into the world and decides to leave his parents' table to dine with his suicidal girlfriend, named Girlfriend. With the next generation in the background popping pills at the other table, Bob and Harriet are at a loss of things to talk about; They finally decide to die and order death from the waitress, who brings back a rope with which the couple can hang themselves.
The play is an excellent reflection of the mechanistic progression through life to which most people submit; They fail to realize the difference between simply existing in boring linearity and sincerely living life to one's fullest potential. It was in this play that the minimalist setup that characterizes Witness - the two tables, few chairs and the plain props of rope, pills and a wine bottle - underscores the simple and universally applicable message of the play. Bob and Harriet were true everymen.
Unfortunately, the Witness Theater fall showcase failed to live to its fullest potential and tragically limped along from an upsetting beginning to a satisfying finale.
The final play of the evening, On the Fall of the Sandwich Board and the Rise of Intangible Cities, has a title that might suggest that, like most of the other plays of the showcase, it was a lost cause. Indeed, as an allegory, it almost became lost in its attempt at becoming high art.
Surprisingly, however, the final play was the best of all four. Written and directed by Levitz and starring Bob (senior Mike Wills), Harriet (junior Emily Daly), Son (junior David Santare), and Girlfriend (freshman Emily Sucher), it carried on crisply with a clear point in mind and excellent execution that evoked a fulfilling emotional response without being too artsy or obscure.
The well-portrayed Bob and Harriet enter as a confused couple on a blind date in a restaurant. After a few minutes, they decide to get married and order a marriage from the waitress as if it were just a bottle of wine or basket of bread.
She soon returns with rope to tie the flabbergasted couple to their table. They later order a baby from the waitress, and, after she provides them with the bundled package, they return it to give it some years to grow up, as if it were just a piece of chicken that needed to be cooked a few more minutes.
Bob and Harriet fail to remember the name of their offspring, however, and he is simply called Son. In Santare's convincing performance as an emo teen, Son reflects on his somewhat meaningless entry into the world and decides to leave his parents' table to dine with his suicidal girlfriend, named Girlfriend. With the next generation in the background popping pills at the other table, Bob and Harriet are at a loss of things to talk about; They finally decide to die and order death from the waitress, who brings back a rope with which the couple can hang themselves.
The play is an excellent reflection of the mechanistic progression through life to which most people submit; They fail to realize the difference between simply existing in boring linearity and sincerely living life to one's fullest potential. It was in this play that the minimalist setup that characterizes Witness - the two tables, few chairs and the plain props of rope, pills and a wine bottle - underscores the simple and universally applicable message of the play. Bob and Harriet were true everymen.
Unfortunately, the Witness Theater fall showcase failed to live to its fullest potential and tragically limped along from an upsetting beginning to a satisfying finale.

Viewing Comments 1 - 8 of 10
Django
posted 10/10/08 @ 12:27 AM EST
Man, the critics get tougher each year. The review, while harsh, was written with adequate skill at sentence construction. However, it was also littered with nonsensical (though grammatically, pretty well constructed) sentences and on at least one occasion, the author grievously misused a word in ignorance of its definition. (Continued…)
ejango
posted 10/10/08 @ 3:08 PM EST
Haha, apparently you were involved with the play? Don't worry, not all plays can be good. Don't take it out on the review. Maybe your next showcase will be better. (Continued…)
ejango
posted 10/10/08 @ 3:47 PM EST
And Django, you should spend less time reviewing reviews and more time writing scripts that actually make sense.
Fjango
posted 10/10/08 @ 4:16 PM EST
And so ejango retaliates with a classic use of argumentum ad hominem, attacking the man speaking rather than his words. Perhaps he does so in the hopes that the failure of such counterarguments to be in any way valid over the last two thousand years will be miraculously remedied in time for his comment to come across as sardonically witty, yet aptly derisive of Django's efforts. (Continued…)
Gjango
posted 10/10/08 @ 4:28 PM EST
Even I feel some of that "aftertaste" of disappointment, and I don't really want to go to a Witness show ever again. The author made his point clear in the sand. (Continued…)
Hjango Y HALO THAR
posted 10/10/08 @ 5:03 PM EST
Y HALO THAR. I AGREE, THE SHOW WAS NOT GOOD AND SCRIPT WRITING NEED TO IMPROVE...
Django
Django
posted 10/11/08 @ 10:54 AM EST
Gjango and Manimala, I hope I did not offend you too much. It was not my intent. I criticized the review because it was not well written and because I do not like it when I see a poorly written article in the JHU Newsletter. (Continued…)
Neil
posted 10/14/08 @ 11:54 AM EST
You should all calm down with your posts. I admit that my review had some minor problems; it was my first review. However, I stand by all my points, and I wish Witness Theater better luck next time. (Continued…)
Post a Comment