Spring Break
Health care takes a back seat in the election
Issue date: 10/9/08
I can only conclude that the standstill is due to the public's wishy-washiness. Americans simply don't know what they want. Or, rather, they know what they want, but they aren't willing to take any of the necessary steps to get it. What is perhaps the most interesting thing about this debate is the combination of America's conviction that every person should have access to affordable, high-quality care, and its simultaneous skepticism concerning every proposed plan for change.
Just look at the public's reaction to some of the ideas for reform. To the suggestion that we require coverage for every American to promote preventive care comes the loud retort that forcing everyone to have insurance is un-American. To the notion that we should cut spending on costly, infrequently used procedures comes the cry that Americans should have access to any medical procedure they could ever possibly want, nevermind the price tag.
Now, I'm not saying that all of these ideas are perfect. I'm just pointing out the irony that Americans demand affordable coverage and access for all, yet reject any policy that has the potential to address these problems.
America's fickleness has reared its head once again in the current election. On the one hand, Barack Obama has suggested creating a national health plan available to all Americans, with guaranteed eligibility, benefits similar to those offered in the plan available to members of Congress and subsidies for those who do not qualify for Medicaid or SCHIP but still need financial aid.
Seemingly, his plan has addressed every criticism. No mandate for universal coverage. Affordable care for every American. Guaranteed access. Choice between private and employer-based coverage.
The public's reaction? Obama's plan is too costly and will create too much regulation.
Senator McCain, on the other hand, wants nothing close to a national health care plan, and instead advocates stimulating the private market and doing away with tax breaks for employer-based health insurance.
Just look at the public's reaction to some of the ideas for reform. To the suggestion that we require coverage for every American to promote preventive care comes the loud retort that forcing everyone to have insurance is un-American. To the notion that we should cut spending on costly, infrequently used procedures comes the cry that Americans should have access to any medical procedure they could ever possibly want, nevermind the price tag.
Now, I'm not saying that all of these ideas are perfect. I'm just pointing out the irony that Americans demand affordable coverage and access for all, yet reject any policy that has the potential to address these problems.
America's fickleness has reared its head once again in the current election. On the one hand, Barack Obama has suggested creating a national health plan available to all Americans, with guaranteed eligibility, benefits similar to those offered in the plan available to members of Congress and subsidies for those who do not qualify for Medicaid or SCHIP but still need financial aid.
Seemingly, his plan has addressed every criticism. No mandate for universal coverage. Affordable care for every American. Guaranteed access. Choice between private and employer-based coverage.
The public's reaction? Obama's plan is too costly and will create too much regulation.
Senator McCain, on the other hand, wants nothing close to a national health care plan, and instead advocates stimulating the private market and doing away with tax breaks for employer-based health insurance.
Be the first to comment on this story