Quantcast The Johns Hopkins News-Letter
College Media Network

News-Letter

Current Issue:
Issue date: 11/19/09
Opinion

Reassessing How We Look at Foreign Aid

  • Print
  • Email
Media Credit: Ava Yap

The current mode of foreign aid is broken. On almost every level, we have consistently failed the people we claim to be trying to help. This is partially due to mismanagement and inherent flaws in the system, but it is mostly due to our own inability to adequately address the complexities of the problems facing the developing world and to seek solutions compatible with the unique situations in these states. William Easterly, in his book White Man's Burden points out that that we (the West) have given more than $300 billion in foreign aid in the last 20 or so years and yet we have failed to achieve any measurable results. $300 billion and we have not been able to end the spread of malaria in children in Africa. $300 billion and we cannot get these kids beds nets. $300 billion and we cannot guarantee immunizations will be in stock when Malawian mother's make the 20 mile trek to the nearest hospital. And so they have to come back another day with their child on their back because they are too sick to walk. $300 billion and we are no closer to eliminating poverty in the developing world.

The reason this is true is that a large portion of foreign aid is aimed at economic development and not necessarily at the specific problems afflicting these people. The proponents of foreign aid venerate the classical model of economic progression when, in reality, the environment that allowed the early industrializers to develop no longer exists. The international community is highly critical of the exploitation of a laboring class and regulatory agencies will not permit countries to foster infrastructural growth by hiding behind high protective tariffs.

The notion that economic development will occur in the same way as it did more than 200 years ago, and thinking that economic progression follows a single spectrum ignores the differences between the West and the developing world. Additionally, I feel compelled to ask how we are so presumptuous to assume that we can end poverty 3000 miles away when we cannot eliminate poverty within our own borders?

I'm not against helping people in need. I believe the West should have a role in the developing world, just not the one to which we currently ascribe. We need to focus our efforts on promoting and protecting basic human rights, not on some archaic model of economic growth and development. We need sweeping changes. We need a complete re-evaluation of the problem. We need to stop using tried and untrue methods when addressing the priorities of foreign aid. Right now a large portion of or foreign aid endowment is focused in pushing our own political agenda and securing our own interests and not in alleviating the oppressive burden of poverty in these areas.
Page 1 of 2 next >

Article Tools

Viewing Comments 1 - 2 of 2

Yi-An Huang

posted 11/21/09 @ 11:00 AM EST

The broad strokes here are absolutely correct, and I think there's a desperate need to re-examine how we are funding, implementing, and evaluating foreign aid. (Continued…)

book report writers

posted 11/24/09 @ 6:58 AM EST

Th? author laid a finger with this article. That's true: we need a complete re-evaluation of the problem. We need to stop using tried and untrue methods when addressing the priorities of foreign aid. (Continued…)

Post a Comment

  • NOTE: Email address will not be published

Type your comment below (html not allowed)

  I understand posting spam or other comments that are unrelated to this article will cause my comment to be flagged for deletion and possibly cause my IP address to be permanently banned from this server.

Advertisement

Advertisement